<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 901 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367165</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for outward freight up to the buyer&#039;s premises on FOR basis was found inadmissible for the period after 01.04.2008. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s principle in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd., the Tribunal treated transportation beyond the place of removal as outside the scope of eligible input service and denied credit on the freight component. The result was that the claimed CENVAT credit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 901 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367165</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for outward freight up to the buyer&#039;s premises on FOR basis was found inadmissible for the period after 01.04.2008. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s principle in Ultra Tech Cement Ltd., the Tribunal treated transportation beyond the place of removal as outside the scope of eligible input service and denied credit on the freight component. The result was that the claimed CENVAT credit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>