<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 894 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367158</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of Cenvat credit for service tax paid on renting cars for employees, citing Rule 2(i) of the CCR. Despite confirming demands and penalties, the Tribunal decided not to impose any penalty in this case, following a previous order and maintaining consistency with the earlier ruling on the disallowance of such credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 894 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367158</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of Cenvat credit for service tax paid on renting cars for employees, citing Rule 2(i) of the CCR. Despite confirming demands and penalties, the Tribunal decided not to impose any penalty in this case, following a previous order and maintaining consistency with the earlier ruling on the disallowance of such credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>