<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1615 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275039</link>
    <description>In transfer pricing matters involving intra-group management services, the revenue cannot determine arm&#039;s length price at nil merely by questioning commercial expediency or perceived benefit, but the assessee must prove actual rendition and receipt of services. On the record, adequate evidence of services received from the associated enterprise was not produced, and the additional material did not conclusively establish rendition. As a result, the nil adjustment to the management service fee was upheld, and the argument that the transaction should be aggregated with other international transactions and benchmarked under TNMM was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2018 18:22:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1615 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275039</link>
      <description>In transfer pricing matters involving intra-group management services, the revenue cannot determine arm&#039;s length price at nil merely by questioning commercial expediency or perceived benefit, but the assessee must prove actual rendition and receipt of services. On the record, adequate evidence of services received from the associated enterprise was not produced, and the additional material did not conclusively establish rendition. As a result, the nil adjustment to the management service fee was upheld, and the argument that the transaction should be aggregated with other international transactions and benchmarked under TNMM was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>