<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1774 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, ruling that the assessment under Section 153A was invalid due to the absence of incriminating material. It was determined that the interest rate applied by the assessee on FCCDs was justifiable within the permissible range, leading to no adjustment. The non-speaking orders by the authorities were deemed invalid, resulting in the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) being considered illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2018 18:22:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1774 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, ruling that the assessment under Section 153A was invalid due to the absence of incriminating material. It was determined that the interest rate applied by the assessee on FCCDs was justifiable within the permissible range, leading to no adjustment. The non-speaking orders by the authorities were deemed invalid, resulting in the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) being considered illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>