<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 996 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act on a partnership firm involved in civil construction works. The firm&#039;s addition to the value of work-in-progress was contested, with the Tribunal ruling that agreeing to the addition did not indicate concealment. The Tribunal emphasized the need to assess each case individually and considered the deduction allowed in the subsequent year as relevant. The decision to cancel the penalty was upheld, citing the absence of contumacious conduct or wilful neglect and the specific tax implications for the subsequent year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 996 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act on a partnership firm involved in civil construction works. The firm&#039;s addition to the value of work-in-progress was contested, with the Tribunal ruling that agreeing to the addition did not indicate concealment. The Tribunal emphasized the need to assess each case individually and considered the deduction allowed in the subsequent year as relevant. The decision to cancel the penalty was upheld, citing the absence of contumacious conduct or wilful neglect and the specific tax implications for the subsequent year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>