https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275033 Gratuity law may apply separately to distinct spells of service where an employee served first as a daily wager and later as a regular employee. The Irrigation and Public Health Department was treated as an establishment covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 because its water-supply functions fell within the statute's scope. The Court further held that daily-wage service and regularised service could be governed by different regimes: gratuity for the daily-wage period under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and gratuity for the regular period under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. Statutory interest was applicable on delayed payment. en-us Wed, 09 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:50:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275033 Gratuity law may apply separately to distinct spells of service where an employee served first as a daily wager and later as a regular employee. The Irrigation and Public Health Department was treated as an establishment covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 because its water-supply functions fell within the statute's scope. The Court further held that daily-wage service and regularised service could be governed by different regimes: gratuity for the daily-wage period under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and gratuity for the regular period under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. Statutory interest was applicable on delayed payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275033