<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 973 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275031</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the appellant, an Engineer-in-Chief, entitled to interest on delayed retiral benefits withheld for four years, totaling about Rs. 12 lakhs, despite being exonerated of charges. Criticizing the High Court&#039;s summary dismissal, the Court remitted the case for fresh consideration, emphasizing timely resolution for the senior citizen appellant. The Court highlighted retiral benefits as a right, not a bounty, allowing interest claims under Statutory Rules, Administrative Instructions, or constitutional provisions. The Government&#039;s actions were scrutinized, with the Court stressing fair treatment and expedited decision-making, directing the High Court to reevaluate the matter thoroughly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 973 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275031</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the appellant, an Engineer-in-Chief, entitled to interest on delayed retiral benefits withheld for four years, totaling about Rs. 12 lakhs, despite being exonerated of charges. Criticizing the High Court&#039;s summary dismissal, the Court remitted the case for fresh consideration, emphasizing timely resolution for the senior citizen appellant. The Court highlighted retiral benefits as a right, not a bounty, allowing interest claims under Statutory Rules, Administrative Instructions, or constitutional provisions. The Government&#039;s actions were scrutinized, with the Court stressing fair treatment and expedited decision-making, directing the High Court to reevaluate the matter thoroughly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>