https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275030 Termination of workmen following closure of an undertaking is governed by Section 25-FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, not by the ordinary retrenchment regime under Section 25-F. Where the undertaking and its sales counters were closed because of unavoidable circumstances, the employees' services ended as a consequence of closure, and the statutory effect was limited to the notice and compensation framework linked to closure. The Labour Court's treatment of the matter as retrenchment was inconsistent with that scheme, so the award could not be sustained and was set aside. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:14:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275030 Termination of workmen following closure of an undertaking is governed by Section 25-FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, not by the ordinary retrenchment regime under Section 25-F. Where the undertaking and its sales counters were closed because of unavoidable circumstances, the employees' services ended as a consequence of closure, and the statutory effect was limited to the notice and compensation framework linked to closure. The Labour Court's treatment of the matter as retrenchment was inconsistent with that scheme, so the award could not be sustained and was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275030