<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1327 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275020</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the mere registration of a trademark at Chennai does not automatically confer jurisdiction to the Madras High Court. While it may be a factor, it is not determinative of a cause of action. Additionally, the court held that the principles of forum conveniens or similar principles are relevant in deciding applications for leave to sue under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, emphasizing the importance of considering the appropriateness of the forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1327 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275020</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the mere registration of a trademark at Chennai does not automatically confer jurisdiction to the Madras High Court. While it may be a factor, it is not determinative of a cause of action. Additionally, the court held that the principles of forum conveniens or similar principles are relevant in deciding applications for leave to sue under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, emphasizing the importance of considering the appropriateness of the forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>