https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275022 The Court dismissed the application for revocation of leave, emphasizing that the substantial part of the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction. The Court held that the issues raised required a trial to determine matters such as the existence and applicability of the Arbitration Clause in the Settlement Agreement. The leave granted to the Plaintiff was considered a preliminary order allowing the suit to be filed without prejudicing the parties' rights on merits. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275022 The Court dismissed the application for revocation of leave, emphasizing that the substantial part of the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction. The Court held that the issues raised required a trial to determine matters such as the existence and applicability of the Arbitration Clause in the Settlement Agreement. The leave granted to the Plaintiff was considered a preliminary order allowing the suit to be filed without prejudicing the parties' rights on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275022