https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275022 For revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, the Court looks primarily at the plaint and supporting averments, not a detailed merits inquiry into the underlying contract dispute. The pleadings showed execution of the agreements at Chennai, payments through a Chennai bank account, substantial performance in Chennai, and an immediate dispute connection with Chennai, so a substantial part of the cause of action was pleaded within jurisdiction. Questions about incorporation of an earlier arbitration clause and the effect of a foreign arbitration clause required interpretation of multiple clauses and factual assessment at trial. The application to revoke leave was dismissed and the suit was allowed to proceed. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275022 For revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, the Court looks primarily at the plaint and supporting averments, not a detailed merits inquiry into the underlying contract dispute. The pleadings showed execution of the agreements at Chennai, payments through a Chennai bank account, substantial performance in Chennai, and an immediate dispute connection with Chennai, so a substantial part of the cause of action was pleaded within jurisdiction. Questions about incorporation of an earlier arbitration clause and the effect of a foreign arbitration clause required interpretation of multiple clauses and factual assessment at trial. The application to revoke leave was dismissed and the suit was allowed to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275022