https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275023 The High Court of Madras revoked the leave granted to the plaintiff to institute a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the first defendant. The court determined it lacked territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action occurred outside its jurisdiction. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to proper jurisdictional boundaries and the doctrine of forum conveniens, the court dismissed the application seeking leave, highlighting that jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent if it does not inherently exist. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275023 The High Court of Madras revoked the leave granted to the plaintiff to institute a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the first defendant. The court determined it lacked territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action occurred outside its jurisdiction. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to proper jurisdictional boundaries and the doctrine of forum conveniens, the court dismissed the application seeking leave, highlighting that jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent if it does not inherently exist. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275023