https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275024 The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the issue concerning the determination of the rate of excise duty fell outside its jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed without prejudice to other remedies available to the Appellant-Department. The Court's decision was based on the understanding that such issues are excluded from the High Court's purview as per the provisions of the Act. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275024 The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the issue concerning the determination of the rate of excise duty fell outside its jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed without prejudice to other remedies available to the Appellant-Department. The Court's decision was based on the understanding that such issues are excluded from the High Court's purview as per the provisions of the Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275024