<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1466 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275017</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and interest prior to 01.06.2007, following the precedent from the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were waived due to the appellant&#039;s genuine contestation and reasonable cause for non-payment. The appeal was partly allowed, providing relief to the appellant based on legal precedents and considerations of bonafide belief and reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1466 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275017</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and interest prior to 01.06.2007, following the precedent from the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were waived due to the appellant&#039;s genuine contestation and reasonable cause for non-payment. The appeal was partly allowed, providing relief to the appellant based on legal precedents and considerations of bonafide belief and reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>