<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1637 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275028</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the Appellants&#039; claims did not qualify as maritime claims against the Respondent vessel under admiralty jurisdiction. Reflect Geophysical, as a demise charterer, lacked beneficial ownership of the vessel. The Court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, dismissing the appeals and ordering the return of the deposited amount to the owners of the Respondent vessel. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1637 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275028</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the Appellants&#039; claims did not qualify as maritime claims against the Respondent vessel under admiralty jurisdiction. Reflect Geophysical, as a demise charterer, lacked beneficial ownership of the vessel. The Court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, dismissing the appeals and ordering the return of the deposited amount to the owners of the Respondent vessel. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>