<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 33 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14450</link>
    <description>The court held that the Commissioner of Income-tax was incorrect in withdrawing the allowance granted by the Income-tax Officer. It was determined that the assessing authority&#039;s order could not be revised under section 263 as the appellate authority had already decided on all items for investment allowance. The court emphasized the doctrine of merger and the limitations of revisional powers, ultimately disposing of the reference without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 33 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14450</link>
      <description>The court held that the Commissioner of Income-tax was incorrect in withdrawing the allowance granted by the Income-tax Officer. It was determined that the assessing authority&#039;s order could not be revised under section 263 as the appellate authority had already decided on all items for investment allowance. The court emphasized the doctrine of merger and the limitations of revisional powers, ultimately disposing of the reference without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>