<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 856 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367120</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow proportionate deductions for Tower T4, following the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. The issue of deductions for Towers T5 and T6 was remanded back to the CIT(A) for re-examination based on the specific provisions of section 80IB(10), without considering revenue neutrality under section 115JB. The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the cross-objection by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 856 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367120</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow proportionate deductions for Tower T4, following the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court. The issue of deductions for Towers T5 and T6 was remanded back to the CIT(A) for re-examination based on the specific provisions of section 80IB(10), without considering revenue neutrality under section 115JB. The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the cross-objection by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>