<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 847 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367111</link>
    <description>The court held that a foreign award is not required to be stamped under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and its non-stamping does not render it unenforceable under Sections 48 and 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the enforceability of the foreign award without the necessity of stamp duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 847 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367111</link>
      <description>The court held that a foreign award is not required to be stamped under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and its non-stamping does not render it unenforceable under Sections 48 and 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the enforceability of the foreign award without the necessity of stamp duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>