https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367105 The High Court dismissed the Criminal Appeal, upholding the acquittal by the V Additional Sessions Court. The court emphasized the necessity of proving a legally enforceable debt, addressing material alterations in cheques, and the burden of proof under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondents successfully raised doubts about their liability, leading to the appeal's dismissal. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:38:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367105 The High Court dismissed the Criminal Appeal, upholding the acquittal by the V Additional Sessions Court. The court emphasized the necessity of proving a legally enforceable debt, addressing material alterations in cheques, and the burden of proof under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondents successfully raised doubts about their liability, leading to the appeal's dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367105