<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 839 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367103</link>
    <description>Additional evidence in the form of a partnership deed may be admitted in appeal under Section 391 CrPC where it is needed to properly decide proof of partnership and authorisation in a cheque dishonour case, and the defect is treated as curable. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act remains maintainable even where the firm is unregistered, because Section 69 of the Partnership Act bars contractual enforcement by civil proceedings but does not extend to criminal prosecution under the special statute. The complaint was restored for fresh trial after permitting proof of partnership and authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 839 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367103</link>
      <description>Additional evidence in the form of a partnership deed may be admitted in appeal under Section 391 CrPC where it is needed to properly decide proof of partnership and authorisation in a cheque dishonour case, and the defect is treated as curable. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act remains maintainable even where the firm is unregistered, because Section 69 of the Partnership Act bars contractual enforcement by civil proceedings but does not extend to criminal prosecution under the special statute. The complaint was restored for fresh trial after permitting proof of partnership and authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>