https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367103 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's judgment. The case was remitted back to the trial Magistrate for the appellant to present evidence regarding the partnership and authorization. The respondent would have the right to cross-examine and present evidence. The court concluded that an unregistered partnership firm could maintain a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, based on the majority view and Supreme Court precedents. The appeal was allowed, and the parties were directed to appear before the trial Magistrate on a specified date. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:38:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367103 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's judgment. The case was remitted back to the trial Magistrate for the appellant to present evidence regarding the partnership and authorization. The respondent would have the right to cross-examine and present evidence. The court concluded that an unregistered partnership firm could maintain a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, based on the majority view and Supreme Court precedents. The appeal was allowed, and the parties were directed to appear before the trial Magistrate on a specified date. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367103