https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367102 The complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution without proper notice to the complainant and failure to consider Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. The judge criticized the trial Magistrate's strict approach and lack of consideration. The judgment allowed the revision petition, setting aside the dismissal order. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Magistrate. The judge emphasized the need for adherence to procedural requirements and legal provisions, highlighting the importance of adjudicating cases on their merits. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:38:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367102 The complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution without proper notice to the complainant and failure to consider Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. The judge criticized the trial Magistrate's strict approach and lack of consideration. The judgment allowed the revision petition, setting aside the dismissal order. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Magistrate. The judge emphasized the need for adherence to procedural requirements and legal provisions, highlighting the importance of adjudicating cases on their merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367102