<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 837 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367101</link>
    <description>The Writ Petition challenging an order for payment of a disputed amount with interest was dismissed. The petitioner contested the assessment of evidence by the Cooperative Court and the Appellate Court, arguing against restrictions on voluntary payments to the Society. The judgment highlighted the Society&#039;s dominant position in transactions and the need to ensure payments are free from coercion. Emphasis was placed on compliance with legal limits and avoiding profiteering. The payment dispute stemmed from a history of disputes between the parties, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition with a modification in the interest rate for the amount to be returned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 837 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367101</link>
      <description>The Writ Petition challenging an order for payment of a disputed amount with interest was dismissed. The petitioner contested the assessment of evidence by the Cooperative Court and the Appellate Court, arguing against restrictions on voluntary payments to the Society. The judgment highlighted the Society&#039;s dominant position in transactions and the need to ensure payments are free from coercion. Emphasis was placed on compliance with legal limits and avoiding profiteering. The payment dispute stemmed from a history of disputes between the parties, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition with a modification in the interest rate for the amount to be returned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>