https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367084 Rectification under the error apparent standard was rejected because the Tribunal had already applied its earlier view in the assessee's own matter that dip reading for cargo measurement in the shore tank should be taken after the cargo had settled, as this best reflected the correct quantity received. The impugned final order followed that earlier decision, so there was no inconsistency or obvious mistake visible on the record. As a result, the rectification application was dismissed. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:37:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367084 Rectification under the error apparent standard was rejected because the Tribunal had already applied its earlier view in the assessee's own matter that dip reading for cargo measurement in the shore tank should be taken after the cargo had settled, as this best reflected the correct quantity received. The impugned final order followed that earlier decision, so there was no inconsistency or obvious mistake visible on the record. As a result, the rectification application was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367084