https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367077 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Smyle Thanda Tel, classifying the product as an Ayurvedic medicine rather than a hair oil. The decision was based on the product's ingredients, intended use, and perception by users, concluding that it had substantial therapeutic value and aligned with authentic Ayurvedic texts. The Tribunal set aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed, allowing the appeal and determining the product's classification as an Ayurvedic medicine. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:37:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367077 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Smyle Thanda Tel, classifying the product as an Ayurvedic medicine rather than a hair oil. The decision was based on the product's ingredients, intended use, and perception by users, concluding that it had substantial therapeutic value and aligned with authentic Ayurvedic texts. The Tribunal set aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed, allowing the appeal and determining the product's classification as an Ayurvedic medicine. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367077