<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 811 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the department&#039;s appeals by remanding the matter for reworking interest liability for specific periods and rejected the appeals regarding setting aside penalties. The demands for recovery of wrongly availed credit amounts were upheld. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues, considering legal interpretations, case laws, and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 811 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the department&#039;s appeals by remanding the matter for reworking interest liability for specific periods and rejected the appeals regarding setting aside penalties. The demands for recovery of wrongly availed credit amounts were upheld. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues, considering legal interpretations, case laws, and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>