<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 808 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367072</link>
    <description>Section 62(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 limits the appellate authority&#039;s power to condone delay to the prescribed statutory extent, but the High Court may in an exceptional case invoke Articles 226 and 227 to prevent failure of justice where sufficient cause is shown. In this matter, the delay in filing the statutory appeal was explained on the ground of illness, and the reassessment order carried a substantial tax demand. The Court treated the case as one warranting supervisory interference rather than rejection on limitation grounds, condoned the delay, and directed the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 808 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367072</link>
      <description>Section 62(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 limits the appellate authority&#039;s power to condone delay to the prescribed statutory extent, but the High Court may in an exceptional case invoke Articles 226 and 227 to prevent failure of justice where sufficient cause is shown. In this matter, the delay in filing the statutory appeal was explained on the ground of illness, and the reassessment order carried a substantial tax demand. The Court treated the case as one warranting supervisory interference rather than rejection on limitation grounds, condoned the delay, and directed the appellate authority to hear the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>