<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 791 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption to the assessee under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the proviso to Section 2(15) was not applicable to the assessee as its activities did not constitute trade, commerce, or business. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the nature of activities and legal precedents in determining tax exemptions for charitable societies promoting Indian art and culture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:48:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 791 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption to the assessee under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the proviso to Section 2(15) was not applicable to the assessee as its activities did not constitute trade, commerce, or business. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the nature of activities and legal precedents in determining tax exemptions for charitable societies promoting Indian art and culture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>