<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 786 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367050</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing relief was found unsustainable where the first appellate authority deleted the adjustment without obtaining a remand report from the Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer and without properly addressing comparability objections. The Tribunal noted that the order accepted and rejected comparables largely on the assessee&#039;s submissions, yet did not deal meaningfully with the reasons given by the Transfer Pricing Officer for rejecting the assessee&#039;s comparables or the basis of the assessee&#039;s challenge to the selected comparables. As the dispute turned on factual comparability and alleged non-supply of financial statements and FAR analysis, fresh adjudication after remand was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 786 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367050</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing relief was found unsustainable where the first appellate authority deleted the adjustment without obtaining a remand report from the Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer and without properly addressing comparability objections. The Tribunal noted that the order accepted and rejected comparables largely on the assessee&#039;s submissions, yet did not deal meaningfully with the reasons given by the Transfer Pricing Officer for rejecting the assessee&#039;s comparables or the basis of the assessee&#039;s challenge to the selected comparables. As the dispute turned on factual comparability and alleged non-supply of financial statements and FAR analysis, fresh adjudication after remand was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>