<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 784 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367048</link>
    <description>Commission and service charges paid to agents were treated as allowable business expenditure under section 37(1) where the assessee substantiated the payments with bills, PAN details, account-payee cheques, tax deduction and deposit records, confirmations, and supporting purchase and export documents. The material showed that the agents assisted in arranging purchases and export-related business, and there was no evidence of routing back of funds or any related-party arrangement. In the absence of contrary evidence and with the books not rejected, mere suspicion by the Revenue was insufficient to disallow the claim. The expenditure was therefore regarded as genuine and wholly and exclusively incurred for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 784 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367048</link>
      <description>Commission and service charges paid to agents were treated as allowable business expenditure under section 37(1) where the assessee substantiated the payments with bills, PAN details, account-payee cheques, tax deduction and deposit records, confirmations, and supporting purchase and export documents. The material showed that the agents assisted in arranging purchases and export-related business, and there was no evidence of routing back of funds or any related-party arrangement. In the absence of contrary evidence and with the books not rejected, mere suspicion by the Revenue was insufficient to disallow the claim. The expenditure was therefore regarded as genuine and wholly and exclusively incurred for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>