<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 778 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices under sections 148 and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10. The Tribunal found that penalties for non-compliance with section 148 notices were not valid under section 271(1)(b) and considered the change of address as a valid reason for non-receipt of notices. As a result, the penalties were deleted, and the appeals of the assessees were allowed, setting a precedent for similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:48:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 778 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices under sections 148 and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10. The Tribunal found that penalties for non-compliance with section 148 notices were not valid under section 271(1)(b) and considered the change of address as a valid reason for non-receipt of notices. As a result, the penalties were deleted, and the appeals of the assessees were allowed, setting a precedent for similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>