<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367030</link>
    <description>Revocation of a customs broker licence and forfeiture of the security deposit were found unsustainable where an employee forged a signature on a duplicate shipping bill without the broker&#039;s knowledge or connivance. The Tribunal noted that no prejudice was caused to revenue, the responsible employees were removed immediately, and no fresh material justified a different conclusion from the earlier finding that the broker should not be penalised absent proved awareness or participation. The extreme penalty was therefore treated as disproportionate and inconsistent with the remand direction and inquiry record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367030</link>
      <description>Revocation of a customs broker licence and forfeiture of the security deposit were found unsustainable where an employee forged a signature on a duplicate shipping bill without the broker&#039;s knowledge or connivance. The Tribunal noted that no prejudice was caused to revenue, the responsible employees were removed immediately, and no fresh material justified a different conclusion from the earlier finding that the broker should not be penalised absent proved awareness or participation. The extreme penalty was therefore treated as disproportionate and inconsistent with the remand direction and inquiry record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>