<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 763 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367027</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the order sanctioning the refund of the differential duty paid by the exporter. It emphasized the provisional nature of the assessment and the authority of the assessing officer to correct mistakes under Section 154 of the Customs Act. The tribunal found no infirmity in the refund sanction and rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 763 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367027</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the order sanctioning the refund of the differential duty paid by the exporter. It emphasized the provisional nature of the assessment and the authority of the assessing officer to correct mistakes under Section 154 of the Customs Act. The tribunal found no infirmity in the refund sanction and rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>