<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 758 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367022</link>
    <description>An educational institution established under a parliamentary enactment was held not to be a business entity because the statutory term was confined to profit-oriented commercial activity, applying ejusdem generis to activities akin to trade or industry. Services received from CPWD were also held not to be support services, because outsourced civil construction was not a function the institution ordinarily carried out in its own operations. In light of the exemption notifications and contemporaneous circular for construction used predominantly as an educational institution, the service tax demand, with interest and penalty, was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 758 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367022</link>
      <description>An educational institution established under a parliamentary enactment was held not to be a business entity because the statutory term was confined to profit-oriented commercial activity, applying ejusdem generis to activities akin to trade or industry. Services received from CPWD were also held not to be support services, because outsourced civil construction was not a function the institution ordinarily carried out in its own operations. In light of the exemption notifications and contemporaneous circular for construction used predominantly as an educational institution, the service tax demand, with interest and penalty, was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>