https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367019 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant department's stay petition seeking to suspend the order setting aside duty demand against cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision was lawful and that there was no concrete basis to suggest inconvenience if the order was not stayed. The appellant's concerns regarding improper invoicing were deemed insufficient to warrant a stay, as there was no recurrence of such issues in subsequent years. The Tribunal rejected the stay petition on 29.08.2018, considering the potential inconvenience to the respondent if the original order was enforced during the appeal process. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:46:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367019 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant department's stay petition seeking to suspend the order setting aside duty demand against cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision was lawful and that there was no concrete basis to suggest inconvenience if the order was not stayed. The appellant's concerns regarding improper invoicing were deemed insufficient to warrant a stay, as there was no recurrence of such issues in subsequent years. The Tribunal rejected the stay petition on 29.08.2018, considering the potential inconvenience to the respondent if the original order was enforced during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367019