https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367014 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for proper classification of services. The Tribunal found that the impugned order lacked reasoning in classifying the services under Site Formation and Clearance category, contrary to the appellant's claim of providing Cargo Handling Service. It directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to provide reasons for the classification and allow the appellant to present relevant documents. The decision emphasized the importance of a reasoned classification between the two service categories. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:45:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367014 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for proper classification of services. The Tribunal found that the impugned order lacked reasoning in classifying the services under Site Formation and Clearance category, contrary to the appellant's claim of providing Cargo Handling Service. It directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to provide reasons for the classification and allow the appellant to present relevant documents. The decision emphasized the importance of a reasoned classification between the two service categories. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367014