<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 737 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application seeking the recall and review of the order dated 23.04.2018 due to errors in recording facts, inadequate opportunity for the appellant&#039;s advocate to present the case, and discrepancies in the order. The Tribunal found that adverse remarks were made without giving the advocate a chance to defend, violating principles of natural justice. As a result, the order was recalled, and the appeal was reinstated to its original status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 737 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application seeking the recall and review of the order dated 23.04.2018 due to errors in recording facts, inadequate opportunity for the appellant&#039;s advocate to present the case, and discrepancies in the order. The Tribunal found that adverse remarks were made without giving the advocate a chance to defend, violating principles of natural justice. As a result, the order was recalled, and the appeal was reinstated to its original status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>