<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 734 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366998</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, holding that the denial of SSI exemption for labels/stickers under Notification No. 8/2003-CE was without merit. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set in the Purab Printers case, determining that labels and stickers fell within the scope of the SSI exemption. It was emphasized that the government&#039;s intention was to grant exemption to goods like labels, even those carrying a customer&#039;s brand name. The Tribunal concluded that all types of labels, including metal labels, manufactured by the appellant were eligible for exemption under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:45:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 734 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366998</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants, holding that the denial of SSI exemption for labels/stickers under Notification No. 8/2003-CE was without merit. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set in the Purab Printers case, determining that labels and stickers fell within the scope of the SSI exemption. It was emphasized that the government&#039;s intention was to grant exemption to goods like labels, even those carrying a customer&#039;s brand name. The Tribunal concluded that all types of labels, including metal labels, manufactured by the appellant were eligible for exemption under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>