<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 731 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366995</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit of service tax paid on garden maintenance service used within factory was treated as admissible input service because the service was linked to the factory premises, supported compliance with pollution control laws, and had a nexus with manufacturing activity. The Tribunal view applied in the note is that such maintenance falls within the scope of input service, so the credit was allowed and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 731 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366995</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit of service tax paid on garden maintenance service used within factory was treated as admissible input service because the service was linked to the factory premises, supported compliance with pollution control laws, and had a nexus with manufacturing activity. The Tribunal view applied in the note is that such maintenance falls within the scope of input service, so the credit was allowed and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>