<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 725 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366989</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the attachment order dated 30.11.2015 due to arrears of sales tax on a property in Cuddalore District. The court found that the original assessment order was properly served by the respondents, allowing for the right of appeal under Section 51 of the Act. As the petitioner did not challenge the original assessment order, objections to the consequential attachment order were precluded. The petitioner was advised to pursue appeal remedies instead of directly challenging the attachment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:44:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 725 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366989</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the attachment order dated 30.11.2015 due to arrears of sales tax on a property in Cuddalore District. The court found that the original assessment order was properly served by the respondents, allowing for the right of appeal under Section 51 of the Act. As the petitioner did not challenge the original assessment order, objections to the consequential attachment order were precluded. The petitioner was advised to pursue appeal remedies instead of directly challenging the attachment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>