https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274998 The tribunal set aside the revocation of a Custom House Agent (CHA) license due to lack of proper evidence and failure to establish grave violations with mens rea or active facilitation. The appellant successfully challenged the revocation, arguing that the conclusions were based on presumptions and lacked corroboration. The tribunal found discrepancies in the investigation and noted that key claims were not substantiated. Ultimately, the revocation was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the necessity for strong evidence and proof of serious violations to warrant license revocation in customs-related cases. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 20:27:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274998 The tribunal set aside the revocation of a Custom House Agent (CHA) license due to lack of proper evidence and failure to establish grave violations with mens rea or active facilitation. The appellant successfully challenged the revocation, arguing that the conclusions were based on presumptions and lacked corroboration. The tribunal found discrepancies in the investigation and noted that key claims were not substantiated. Ultimately, the revocation was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the necessity for strong evidence and proof of serious violations to warrant license revocation in customs-related cases. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274998