https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275002 The Tribunal rejected the adjournment application by the appellant CHA, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense and the age of the appeal. It was found that individuals associated with Zulash Clearing & Shipping Agency engaged in forgery, leading to proceedings under the CHALR, 2004. The Commissioner's leniency in dropping proceedings was questioned, prompting a remand for further scrutiny. The Tribunal directed an enquiry into the prosecution of those involved in forgery and disposed of the appeals by remanding the matter for thorough examination. en-us Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 20:27:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275002 The Tribunal rejected the adjournment application by the appellant CHA, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense and the age of the appeal. It was found that individuals associated with Zulash Clearing & Shipping Agency engaged in forgery, leading to proceedings under the CHALR, 2004. The Commissioner's leniency in dropping proceedings was questioned, prompting a remand for further scrutiny. The Tribunal directed an enquiry into the prosecution of those involved in forgery and disposed of the appeals by remanding the matter for thorough examination. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275002