<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1260 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Assessing Officer was instructed to review the contract documents and evidence provided by the assessee to verify that the work was carried out by the assessee and not claimed by IMAGE for deduction under Section 80-IA. The Tribunal overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and directed a fresh assessment for the years 2010-2011 and 2012-2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 20:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1260 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Assessing Officer was instructed to review the contract documents and evidence provided by the assessee to verify that the work was carried out by the assessee and not claimed by IMAGE for deduction under Section 80-IA. The Tribunal overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and directed a fresh assessment for the years 2010-2011 and 2012-2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>