https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275004 The appeal challenged the demand of a differential duty on goods imported at a concessional rate but not used for the intended purpose. The Tribunal referred to a previous ruling in favor of the appellant involving a similar issue and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the significance of consistency in legal judgments and relied on precedent to resolve the issue in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 20:27:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275004 The appeal challenged the demand of a differential duty on goods imported at a concessional rate but not used for the intended purpose. The Tribunal referred to a previous ruling in favor of the appellant involving a similar issue and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the significance of consistency in legal judgments and relied on precedent to resolve the issue in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275004