<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1902 (2) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274993</link>
    <description>The court held that the plaintiffs&#039; current suit was not barred by Section 43 of the Civil Procedure Code. It determined that the former suit did not encompass the entire claim against the current defendant concerning Schedule A, as the causes of action and defendants differed. The judgment overturned the lower appellate court&#039;s ruling and referred the appeal for consideration on its merits, with costs to be decided during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1902 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1902 (2) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274993</link>
      <description>The court held that the plaintiffs&#039; current suit was not barred by Section 43 of the Civil Procedure Code. It determined that the former suit did not encompass the entire claim against the current defendant concerning Schedule A, as the causes of action and defendants differed. The judgment overturned the lower appellate court&#039;s ruling and referred the appeal for consideration on its merits, with costs to be decided during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1902 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>