https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274986 Non-compliance with a Tribunal stay order requiring deposit of part of the confirmed service tax justified dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to satisfy the stay condition directed by the CESTAT, and the appeal was dismissed for breach of that pre-deposit requirement. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:42:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274986 Non-compliance with a Tribunal stay order requiring deposit of part of the confirmed service tax justified dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to satisfy the stay condition directed by the CESTAT, and the appeal was dismissed for breach of that pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274986