<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 722 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366986</link>
    <description>The appeal was treated as covered by the binding precedent in Commissioner of Income Tax 5, Mumbai v. Essar Teleholdings Limited. On that common ground, the Supreme Court applied the earlier decision and disposed of the appeal in accordance with it, without undertaking any further adjudication on the merits. The operative effect was dismissal of the appeal because the issues raised were already concluded by the cited authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 722 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366986</link>
      <description>The appeal was treated as covered by the binding precedent in Commissioner of Income Tax 5, Mumbai v. Essar Teleholdings Limited. On that common ground, the Supreme Court applied the earlier decision and disposed of the appeal in accordance with it, without undertaking any further adjudication on the merits. The operative effect was dismissal of the appeal because the issues raised were already concluded by the cited authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>