<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 700 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest under section 14A, stating that as no exempt dividend income was earned, section 14A did not apply. The issue of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) concerning payments made to Mrs. Sandhya Prakash was remanded back to the AO for further verification. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly for statistical purposes and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2011-12.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 700 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest under section 14A, stating that as no exempt dividend income was earned, section 14A did not apply. The issue of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) concerning payments made to Mrs. Sandhya Prakash was remanded back to the AO for further verification. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly for statistical purposes and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2011-12.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>