https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366939 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection order by the Settlement Commission under the Customs Act. Despite the petitioner's failure to pay the full interest amount initially, the Court considered the legal advice received and subsequent actions taken, including a deposit as directed by the Court. The Court emphasized timely compliance and proper guidance in dealings with the Settlement Commission. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Commission for further proceedings, with specified payment terms and adherence to prescribed timelines, while leaving the evaluation of all aspects to the Settlement Commission without commenting on the case's merits. en-us Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:20:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366939 The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection order by the Settlement Commission under the Customs Act. Despite the petitioner's failure to pay the full interest amount initially, the Court considered the legal advice received and subsequent actions taken, including a deposit as directed by the Court. The Court emphasized timely compliance and proper guidance in dealings with the Settlement Commission. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Commission for further proceedings, with specified payment terms and adherence to prescribed timelines, while leaving the evaluation of all aspects to the Settlement Commission without commenting on the case's merits. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366939