<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 673 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366937</link>
    <description>The court upheld that the appellant must pay administrative charges for importing molasses into Tamil Nadu for export. Failure to segregate stock intended for export, obtain an ML-5 license, and comply with statutory obligations under Molasses Control Rules resulted in the dismissal of appeals. The judgment emphasized that payment of export fees in another state does not exempt from fulfilling Tamil Nadu&#039;s requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 673 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366937</link>
      <description>The court upheld that the appellant must pay administrative charges for importing molasses into Tamil Nadu for export. Failure to segregate stock intended for export, obtain an ML-5 license, and comply with statutory obligations under Molasses Control Rules resulted in the dismissal of appeals. The judgment emphasized that payment of export fees in another state does not exempt from fulfilling Tamil Nadu&#039;s requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>