<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 672 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366936</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to reject a drawback claim on goods labeled as &#039;brass sanitary fittings,&#039; instead categorizing them as &#039;brass nuts and bolts.&#039; The tribunal criticized the lack of testing and verification by authorities and emphasized the distinction between the two product types. Finding the denial of drawback without sufficient evidence invalid, the tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeals and ruling in favor of the exporter and custom house agent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 672 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366936</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to reject a drawback claim on goods labeled as &#039;brass sanitary fittings,&#039; instead categorizing them as &#039;brass nuts and bolts.&#039; The tribunal criticized the lack of testing and verification by authorities and emphasized the distinction between the two product types. Finding the denial of drawback without sufficient evidence invalid, the tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeals and ruling in favor of the exporter and custom house agent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>