<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 671 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Misc. Application, directing the Commissioner to accept a bank guarantee for the unpaid differential duty after adjusting the deposit made during the investigation related to the seizure of goods. The Tribunal clarified that the deposit was not towards past liability and ordered the provisional release of goods within 15 days, emphasizing the adjustment of the deposit against the differential duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 671 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Misc. Application, directing the Commissioner to accept a bank guarantee for the unpaid differential duty after adjusting the deposit made during the investigation related to the seizure of goods. The Tribunal clarified that the deposit was not towards past liability and ordered the provisional release of goods within 15 days, emphasizing the adjustment of the deposit against the differential duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>