<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 671 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366935</link>
    <description>For provisional release of seized goods, the security required by bank guarantee for the differential duty had to be computed after adjusting the amount already deposited during investigation. The deposit was treated as connected with the seizure, and in the absence of a show cause notice or confirmed demand, it could not be regarded as unrelated to the present liability. The modified condition therefore limited the bank guarantee to the unpaid balance of the differential duty, and provisional release was directed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 671 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366935</link>
      <description>For provisional release of seized goods, the security required by bank guarantee for the differential duty had to be computed after adjusting the amount already deposited during investigation. The deposit was treated as connected with the seizure, and in the absence of a show cause notice or confirmed demand, it could not be regarded as unrelated to the present liability. The modified condition therefore limited the bank guarantee to the unpaid balance of the differential duty, and provisional release was directed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>